The Role of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls Essay examples -- An I

The Role of the tester in An Inspector CallsAn Inspector Calls is a tactics with umpteen social and political messages. J. B. Priestley believed a massive deal in socialism and he used several of his plays to give and influence people to be Socialist as well. It was written in a time when Britain was ruled by a Labour establishment and socialist policies were seen as the way forward. It was a popular way of persuasion at that time so Priestleys aim for the play was probably to read the unconvinced. The Inspector in J. B. Priestleys An Inspector Calls is one of the most thought-provoking and qabalistic characters that modern day literature has yet produced. It is this mysterious element that contributes greatly to making him a very interesting character and one that may be perceived in many ways. The audience does non learn a great deal out near the Inspector and cryptograph is explicitly told to us we are given hints and clues from the way he acts and what he says and ar e forced to piece these together to form our own ideas about his identity and his intentions. In this way, Priestley has asked his audience to act as a say and to reach personal conclusions about him. The role of the Inspector is one of many levels. In terms of how he is used in the basic social organization of the play, he is there to move the play along in that he encourages the characters to tell their stories. If there was not the revelation that he was not a real Police Inspector, he would only be considered as a narrator and not play a big part in the play. Because it transpired that he was an impostor of sorts, further headways are asked by the audience and disparate insights have become likely and it is clear that the Inspector is in the play for many reasons. T... ...e unpunished. One must conclude that the Inspectors main purpose is to teach. In the context of the play, he told the characters what had happened to a particular girl because they had each been abominabl e of selfishness. In regards to the whole of society, he voiced Priestleys opinions that we cannot make any pass if we do not work together. In my opinion, those watching or interpretation the play today would not gain as much from the humbug in regards to the moral teachings because most have now accepted the advantages of socialism over Capitalism and so do not have as much to learn on the arguments of this issue as the audiences of 1947. In regards to the question of what the Inspector actually was, I personally feel that there is not enough evidence given for even a strong, fact-supported theory to be produced to answer the question, let alone an infallible answer.