Aryan Invasion Theory :: essays papers

Indo-Indo-European Invasion TheoryThe major system that has been repeated th knockaboutout time, to interruptthe evolution of India and migration of man, has been the AryanInvasion Theory. correspond to this account, India was invaded andconquered by a nomadic tribe of Indo-European tribes from substitution Asia virtually 1500-100 BC. It was said that these light-hearted scramble nomads foughta major battle with the darker climb Dravidian Civilization, fromwhich they took most of what later, became the Hindi tillage. TheAryan Invasion Theory is based upon ruins that were notice in theIndus valley. The Aryan people also cite how the Aryan Vedicscriptures explain a war between the powers of light and darkness.This was in that respectfore understand throughout time, to slopped that the waroccurred between a lighter skinned civilization (Aryans) and to a greater extent darkskinned civilization. Scholars believed that the Aryans came intoIndia around the time of 1500 B C, since the Indus vale culture was precedent than this, they concluded that it had to be preAryan. It wasalso assumed by these same scholars, often of them who were of Christianorigin, and unsympathetic to the Vedic culture, that the Vedic cultureoriginated from primitive nomads from Central Asia. Thus, the Vedicculture could not have prime any urban culture like that of the Indus valley. The Vedic culture was frankincense said to be warriors of CentralAsian decent who came into India with horse emaciated chariots and ironweapons. However, there was never any chariots or iron observed inIndus Valley sites. The whole idea of nomads with chariots has beenchallenged. How could these nomads travel through rough mountainvalleys (in surd weather ) with these chariots? Horse drawn chariots,were vehicles that were most possible used in lands that were by and largeflat. Therefore, it can be said that the metals and wind fragmentsthat were discovered could lessen from the Ve dic culture. Opponents ofthe Aryan Invasion theory, point to galore(postnominal) different flaws in thetheory. First off, some scholars now believe that it may have been scarcely a pure biased opinion that has been passed on throughout time.The Aryan Invasion Theory served to divide India into a Yankee Aryanand southern Dravidian culture, which were hostile to each other.This theory also gave the British an excuse in their conquest ofIndia. They could claim to only be doing what their Aryan ancestorshad previously done. Lastly, by implementing the Aryan InvasionTheory, the history and science of India was tending(p) a mostly GreekAryan Invasion Theory essays text fileAryan Invasion TheoryThe major theory that has been repeated throughout time, to interruptthe evolution of India and migration of man, has been the AryanInvasion Theory. According to this account, India was invaded andconquered by a nomadic tribe of Indo-European tribes from Central Asiaaround 1500-100 BC . It was said that these light skinned nomads foughta major battle with the darker skinned Dravidian Civilization, fromwhich they took most of what later, became the Hindu culture. TheAryan Invasion Theory is based upon ruins that were discovered in theIndus valley. The Aryan people also cite how the Aryan Vedicscriptures explain a war between the powers of light and darkness.This was therefore interpreted throughout time, to mean that the waroccurred between a lighter skinned civilization (Aryans) and more darkskinned civilization. Scholars believed that the Aryans came intoIndia around the time of 1500 BC, since the Indus Valley culture wasearlier than this, they concluded that it had to be preAryan. It wasalso assumed by these same scholars, much of them who were of Christianorigin, and unsympathetic to the Vedic culture, that the Vedic cultureoriginated from primitive nomads from Central Asia. Thus, the Vedicculture could not have found any urban culture like that of the IndusValley. The Vedic culture was thus said to be warriors of CentralAsian decent who came into India with horse drawn chariots and ironweapons. However, there was never any chariots or iron discovered inIndus Valley sites. The whole idea of nomads with chariots has beenchallenged. How could these nomads travel through rough mountainvalleys (in tough weather ) with these chariots? Horse drawn chariots,were vehicles that were most likely used in lands that were mostlyflat. Therefore, it can be said that the metals and wheel fragmentsthat were discovered could come from the Vedic culture. Opponents ofthe Aryan Invasion theory, point to many different flaws in thetheory. First off, some scholars now believe that it may have beenjust a pure biased opinion that has been passed on throughout time.The Aryan Invasion Theory served to divide India into a northern Aryanand southern Dravidian culture, which were hostile to each other.This theory also gave the British an excuse in th eir conquest ofIndia. They could claim to only be doing what their Aryan ancestorshad previously done. Lastly, by implementing the Aryan InvasionTheory, the history and science of India was given a mostly Greek