Cash Grants Essay example -- Mexican Government, The Cash Program

cover the compact of co-responsibility between the government and recipients. What is acquireed to make the compact imprint? Progresa had the goal of increasing the basic capabilities of extremely poor people in rural Mexico (Levine, 2007, p.67). Progresa is a program substantial by the government of Mexico in 1997, and was implemented by President Ernesto Zedillo. With the help of Santiago Levy who was an economist, Progresa was developed to help break the cycle of poverty in Mexico. In instal for the compact to work between the government and the recipients, a change had to vex place from the governments standpoint. The government came to the realization of what the recipients needed and to provide that for them. Since the government was unbidden to fund the program to help the recipients, it demanded the recipients responsibility towards the program. For the first time, the Government of the body politic set in motion a program that will fight with the causes of poverty i n an integral manner (Levine, 2007, p. 67). The recipients would be held accountable for their destiny in the program. They would be held liable for participating in the program by creation responsible and attri anding the responsibility of their choices towards the program. The government funded the program financially mend the recipients responsibility included sending the children to school, getting the children immunized, and making sure their healthcare and nutritional needs were met. What was needed to make the compact work was the concretion and responsibility of the government and the recipients as a team. Why were the cash grants addicted to mothers? Do you think this was a good idea or a bad one? What might have been positive and negative consequences of this choice... ...not streamlined there burn be a greater risk of money not being used wisely. There would be a need to have precautions set in place to prevent funds from being misused or even the overspendin g of funds that would be used to advance to recipients. One way of creating an efficient system is to have simple rake mechanisms. Evidence suggests that small regular, automated payments are little likely to confirm corruption than large, infrequent, discretionary payments. The spread of computerisation will help in this regard, but will be much reinforced by the eventual opening of personal identity systems, and the registration of births, deaths and marriages(Farrington,2005). Organization is also a backbone to being an efficient program. With organization their can possibly be less confusion of how the program is intended to be designed so it can grow towards success.